The Implementation of a First-Order Logic AGM Belief Revision System
نویسندگان
چکیده
Belief revision is increasingly being seen as central to a number of fundamental problems in Artificial Intelligence such as nonmonotonic reasoning, reasoning about action, truth maintenance and database update. This paper describes the first implementation of an AGM belief revision system. The system is based on classical firstorder logic, and for any finitely representable belief state, it efficiently computes expansions, contractions and revisions satisfying the AGM postulates for rational belief change. The system uses a finite base to represent a belief set, and interprets a partially specified entrenchment as representing a unique ‘most conservative’ entrenchment – this is motivated by considerations of evidence and by the close connections between belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning. We describe in detail the algorithms for belief change, and give some examples of the system’s operation.
منابع مشابه
Belief Revision: A Computational Approach
In order to reason about the real world, intelligent systems must have ways of dealing with incomplete and inconsistent information. This issue is addressed in the study of nonmonotonic reasoning, truth maintenance and database update. Belief revision is a formal approach which is central to these areas. This thesis describes a computational approach to the logic of belief revision developed by...
متن کاملAGM Belief Revision in Monotone Modal Logics
Classical modal logics, based on the neighborhood semantics of Scott and Montague, provide a generalization of the familiar normal systems based on Kripke semantics. This paper defines AGM revision operators on several first-order monotonic modal correspondents, where each first-order correspondence language is defined by Marc Pauly’s version of the van Benthem characterization theorem for mono...
متن کاملA Finite Base Belief Revision System
Theories of dynamic reasoning invariably are more elegant on paper than they are in an implementation. A major criticism of the AGM belief revision logic [Gärdenfors 1988] is that it relies on calculations using infinite belief sets to satisfy its postulates for rational belief revision. This has stopped it from being used in any practical systems for reasoning. [Williams 1993] proposes a theor...
متن کاملBelief Change in Branching Time: AGM-consistency and Iterated Revision
We study belief change in the branching-time structures introduced in [4]. First, we identify a property of branching-time frames that is equivalent to AGM-consistency, which is defined as follows. A frame is AGM-consistent if the partial belief revision function associated with an arbitrary state-instant pair and an arbitrary model based on that frame can be extended to a full belief revision ...
متن کاملAxiomatic characterization of the AGM theory of belief revision in a temporal logic
Since belief revision deals with the interaction of belief and information over time, branching-time temporal logic seems a natural setting for a theory of belief change. We propose two extensions of a modal logic that, besides the next-time temporal operator, contains a belief operator and an information operator. The first logic is shown to provide an axiomatic characterization of the first s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1993